Occasional, small problem with addition of a shortcut and suggestion, in regards to error-checking

Discussion, questions and support.
Post Reply
User avatar
Oblomov
Posts: 184
Joined: Mar 4th, ’19, 19:44

Post by Oblomov » Apr 2nd, ’20, 20:29

Just wanted to point out that sometimes, it seems as though while trying to define a shortcut, the program doesn't always disable shortcut execution. I.e. when you fill out the shortcut input, you may accidentally execute existing commands. This doesn't seem to happen often, but from time to time. Usually not that big of a deal at all really

Image

Using this opportunity, I would also like to make a suggestion in regards to 'Checking for errors' process, it takes a very long time for me to finish, and I'm thinking, it would be really nice if one could cancel the 'Checking for errors' process, and just go from there. Removing the recently added or altered command, as I personally, always hit 'Apply', after any changes made to a command or the like. Would definitely help in regards to time-saving

Best wishes,
🦝
Last edited by Oblomov on Apr 3rd, ’20, 21:13, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Marko
Posts: 1719
Joined: Mar 2nd, ’13, 21:02

Post by Marko » Apr 3rd, ’20, 08:14

Thanks, we will take a look. ;)
Post Reply